|
Saline Area Schools |
|
Request for Proposal |
|
Allowable Contract Date: November 11, 2009 |
Saline Area Schools
E-Mail contact preferred:
Thomas S. Wall (wallt@saline.k12.mi.us)
Important Notes:
The district reserves the right to accept or reject any or all quotations.
Telephone Service
Local Dial Tone Service
# of Buildings = 9
# of Lines = Digital PRI/ISDN with 19 - 30 trunks
# of Extensions = 85-95
DID #'s = 200-300
Minimum of 23 existing PBXs
Voice-over IP, if cost effective
Long Distance Service
# of Buildings = 9
# of Lines = 120-160
# of Extensions = 85-95
Voice-over IP, if cost effective
Voice-over IP, if cost effective
Minimum of 1 PRI, if cost-effective and available
Cellular Service
# of Cell Phones = 31-40
# of pooled minutes = 4,500 - 7,500
Push-to-talk
Wireless Internet service for 25-30 cell phones
Telecommunications add-alternates for a multi-year contract may be considered for each of the telecommunication services described above.
Alternate 1: Telephone and/or cellular service as described above with 2-year contract.
Alternate 2: Telephone and/or cellular service as described above with 3-year contract.
Telephone service includes, but is not limited to, those items/components that are USF eligible. Any additional telephone service not covered by USF eligibility, must be itemized and quoted separately. Please contact Thomas S. Wall (wallt@saline.k12.mi.us) for details.

Internet Access
Internet access includes, but is not limited to, those items/components that are USF eligible. Any additional service not covered by USF eligibility must be itemized and quoted separately. Please refer to the 2009 USF Eligible Services List. It is the intent of the district to obtain the highest value at the most reasonable price.
Add-alternates for a multi-year contract may be considered.
Alternate 1: Internet access as described above with 2-year contract.
Alternate 2: Internet access as described above with 3-year contract.
Please contact Thomas S. Wall (wallt@saline.k12.mi.us) for details.
Bid Evaluation
Although the cost of the product/service is of primary concern, the ability to accommodate growth and change and the total cost of operation (TCO) within the district are, in many ways, more important. Do not assume the lowest bid will be awarded the project.
To achieve this goal, bids will be evaluated on several factors.
Prices/charges
Prior experience
Understanding of needs
Financial stability
Personnel qualifications
Comply with the spirit of the district's long range technology plan
Compatibility with district hardware/software standards as set forth within district's long range technology plan
Provide lower long-term cost of ownership
Ability to upgrade and adapt to technological advances
Completeness of response and adherence to bid specifications
Summary of project implementation plan
Capability of the bidder to successfully complete the installation within the required timeframe.